<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] RAA Motion
I would accept either or both as a frendly amendment Kristina. I
apparently misunderstood.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:14 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] RAA Motion
Thanks for your work on this, Chuck. Because I do not agree
that "there is strong support for the agreed-to amendments" across the
entire ICANN community, I suggest that that language be removed or,
alternatively, revised to indicate the segments of the community within
which there is strong support.
K
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:59 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] RAA Motion
Attached and copied below is a motion regarding the
revised RAA for consideration of the Council in our 18 Dec meeting.
Chuck
RAA Motion for GNSO Council - 11 Dec 08
Whereas:
* ICANN has undertaken a lengthy consultative
process related to amending the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA).
* In response to community input via that process,
ICANN Staff and the Registrars Constituency agreed on a set of proposed
amendments to the Registry Registrar Agreement (RAA).
* There is strong support for those agreed-to
amendments, albeit many have suggested that the amendments should go
further.
* The current terms in the RAA date back to 1999
and many have needed revision for years.
Resolve:
* The GNSO Council asks Staff to work with
registrars and the Council to define the most expeditious process for
implementing the agreed-to proposed amendments to the RAA as soon as
possible.
* The GNSO Council will form a drafting team to
review the superset of proposed RAA issues and amendments not addressed
in the presently proposed and agreed-to amendments and develop a request
for an Issues Report, including clear identification of the policy
issues that are involved.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|