Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am sorry I do not seem to have received it.

If I understand correctly, you are withdrawing that and allowing Olga  
to stand as the single candidate.
I think a liaison to SSAC is a good idea.  We should talk about this  
in council and consult with SSAC on the idea.
thanks

a.

On 29 Oct 2008, at 13:38, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> I had sent you a msg Mon as i thought you had asked.  But i am good  
> with Olga in this role.
> Our new SC's should consider defining these roles ideally.  We  
> should also have one for SSAC, and i would volunteer as liason.
> Thx,
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:58:16
> To: Council GNSO<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I suppose if no one in the council objects, it could be done this way.
> I think given the many topics we have in common or at at least
> touching, the sooner we get the liaison established the better.
>
> On the other hand I need to hear from Mike whether he volunteered for
> consideration in time and I just missed it.  If so, then I will need
> to ask Glen to set up the voting mechanism.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 11:09, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > I would be okay if Olga served in an interim capacity at the ccNSO
> > meeting until we decide unless there is someone else who wants to be
> > considered for this role and then we should pick one of them to
> > serve in Cairo on an interim basis.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ] On Behalf Of Greg Ruth
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:59 AM
> > To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> > Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
> >
> > Avri,
> >      I'm in favor of Olga serving in this capacity, too, but I
> > guess the Council should give some formal confirmation.  Were you
> > hoping that our liaison would participate in the Cairo ccNSO
> > meetings?  Could this be done informally by Olga before she is
> > confirmed?
> > Greg
> > From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> > To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:16:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This hadn't been my plan, but can certainly do so if this is what is
> > council members want to do.
> >
> > a.
> >
> > On 29 Oct 2008, at 08:02, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > > Avri,
> > >
> > > I am personally fine with Olga serving as GNSO Council liaison to
> > the
> > > ccNSO but I do think that we should confirm the decision in our
> > > meeting
> > > next Wednesday in Cairo and assume that is your plan.  This is
> > > especially important because most Councilors will be traveling some
> > > time
> > > this week.
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:33 AM
> > > > To: Council GNSO
> > > > Subject: Re: [council] ccNSO Liaison
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have received the name of one interested council member:
> > > > Olga Cavalli.
> > > >
> > > > As mentioned below, I request that anyone who objects to
> > > > appointing Olga to the liaison role, please let me know
> > > > before the end of the week (31 Oct).  If I receive an
> > > > objection, I will ask that Glen set up
> > > > the voting mechanism for majority confirmation of Olga in
> > > > this role.
> > > > If I receive no objections, I will inform this list and the
> > > > ccNSO chair of our appointment..
> > > >
> > > > While we did not discuss this I recommend that this role,
> > > > like other roles, be one that nis chosen on a yearly basis.
> > > > As we  resolve the issues of the election of GNSO chair in
> > > > the bi-cameral setup, I suggest that we can also cover the
> > > > election of other Council wide roles such as this one.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > a.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 27 Oct 2008, at 13:52, Avri Doria wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have sent the letter to Chris, ccNSO chair, as approved
> > > > in the last
> > > > > meeting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Additionally, I have received the name of one council member who
> > is
> > > > > interested in taking on this task.  I ask anyone else who wishes
> > to
> > > > > be considered to send me their name in the next 24 hours.
> > > > i will
> > > > > send out the name of the candidates once the 24 hours period has
> > > > > ended.
> > > > >
> > > > > As we discussed in the meeting, if I receive more then one name, I
> > > > > will ask Glen to setup a formal vote.  If I only have one
> > > > name, I will
> > > > > ask for anyone who objects to the appointment of the named council
> > > > > member to send me email indicating that objection.  If we have an
> > > > > objection, then I will call for an election process on the single
> > > > > individual where people will have the opportunity to vote for or
> > > > > against that person.  Majority in favor will be required for
> > > > > appointment in any election process.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > a.