<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed bylaws change on term limits for GNSO Council members - open for public comment
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed bylaws change on term limits for GNSO Council members - open for public comment
- From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:38:36 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcktjM/+EgKFA5v1Tj2nwEr0X3VHHg==
- Thread-topic: Proposed bylaws change on term limits for GNSO Council members - open for public comment
All,
As you may know, in November 2006, the GNSO Council passed a resolution
endorsing term limits, wherein a council member could serve no more than two
consecutive terms (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200611 ). The resolution
also stated that a former council member must remain off the GNSO Council for
one full term prior to serving any subsequent term.
The ICANN Board Governance Committee subsequently included term limits as a
recommendation in the GNSO Improvements Report
(http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03feb08.pdf,
see Sec. 5.1, p. 28) The Report recommends that the preferred limit be two
2-year terms, in order to enhance inclusiveness and enable more people to
become involved in Council activities.
Following is a link to the announcement and public comment notice for a forum
that has just opened on this proposed change, prior to final Board action,
which includes proposed new bylaws text:
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-13oct08-en.htm, and
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gnso-bylaw-revision . The draft bylaws
change also creates an exception, as recommended previously by the GNSO Council
and the Board Governance Committee, in a "special circumstance," such as
geographic diversity requirements, where no alternative representative is
available to serve. Please note also that because the GNSO Council,
constituencies and ICANN staff are working to implement a new structure for
constituency representation and voting for the GNSO Council, comments are
particularly invited on whether the pending reorganization presents issues for
the implementation of term limits that should be considered before term limits
are adopted, including any other aspects of the new structure, such as the
creation of stakeholder groups or the formation of new constituencies. ICANN
also invites comments on when term limits should go into effect. The comment
period is open until 3 November.
Thanks, Liz
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|