ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Travel Funding - registry proposal

  • To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Travel Funding - registry proposal
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:16:50 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <33B091710A9C4DDBAFDE28EFDDF4EEDB@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07025855B3@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <33B091710A9C4DDBAFDE28EFDDF4EEDB@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AckIUqja6us/W+P+S3WgidX3gW9JxQAAWXOgAAUUxuA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Travel Funding - registry proposal

That is correct Philip. It is fully in line with the ICANN Travel
Procedure and also fully consistent with constituency positions publicly
communicated by the RyC.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
        Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:52 AM
        To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [council] Travel Funding - registry proposal
        
        
        Chuck, 
        just for clarification:
        the registry nomination for the highly limited travel funding
which has been calculated based on the number of Council members is:
        NOT a Council member
        NOT a working group chair
        NOT active on a current Council working group.
         
        Is this correct ?
        Philip
         



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>