<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: ccNSO Proposal to review Definition of ICANN Geographic Regions
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: ccNSO Proposal to review Definition of ICANN Geographic Regions
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:25 -0400
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <aafc0f850807151051t3c8f3b23l5b1a38b4b5c68b95@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
This issue has ben added to the Other Business part of our agenda on
Thursday. Denise, or perhaps someone else from staff, will give an
overview of the topic and then we can discuss how we want to go about
dealing with it.
Thanks
a.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Denise Michel" <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 July 2008 13:51:57 EDT
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: ccNSO Proposal to review Definition of ICANN Geographic
Regions
Dear Avri and Chuck:
The ICANN Board invited the ICANN community (including the ALAC,
ASO, ccNSO, GAC and GNSO) to provide input on the proposal by the
ccNSO to appoint a community-wide working group to review the
structure of ICANN's present Geographic Regions and related issues.
The Board recognized that any potential change to ICANN Geographic
Regions would have "wide-spread effect" in ICANN and that it should
seek the views of the other Supporting Organizations and Advisory
Committees before taking further action. The ICANN Board directed
Staff to summarize and analyze that community input and to
subsequently prepare a report for consideration to the Board.
The GNSO is kindly requested to provide input, if any, on the
suggested formation of a community wide working group, and its
mandate.
Staff is targeting a Board report, summarizing all responses
received, by early September. We hope that the GNSO will be able to
provide input on the relative importance of the Geographic Regions
structure to the At-Large community in general and to the value of a
community-wide working group specifically, by that time. We expect
that the proposed working group, if ultimately formed, will reach
out to the broader community to seek further input and perspectives.
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. For your
convenience links to relevant background documents are included
below. Please contact Rob Hoggarth, Senior Policy Director (policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx
), who is staffing this issue, if you have any questions. We look
forward to following-up with the GNSO.
Regards,
Denise Michel
Vice President Policy
Background Document Links Regarding ICANN Geographic Region and the
Board's Request for SO and AC Comments:
Minutes of ICANN Board 16 July 2000 Containing Resolution 00.64
Adopting Geographic Regions Structure
(<http://www.icann.org/minutes/minutes-16jul00.htm>)
ICANN GAC Communique Advising That International Norms Be Used For
ICANN Geographic Regions
(<http://www.icann.org/committees/gac/communique-14jul00.htm>)
Minutes of Montreal meeting (June 2003). Reaffirmation of ICANNs
Geographic Regions (<http://www.icann.org/minutes/
minutes-26jun03.htm>)
United Nations Composition of macro geographical (continental)
regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other
groupings, revised 31 January 2008
(<http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm>)
Regions Working Group Draft Report for Submission to ICANN Board for
Public Consultation
(<http://ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-08aug07.htm>)
ICANN Geographical Regions
Final Report by the ccNSO Regions Working Group
For Submission to the ICANN Board
(<http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccnso-final-report-regions-wg-240907.pdf
>)
ICANN Board Resolution (07.92), 2 November 2007
(<http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-02nov07.htm -
_Toc55609368>)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|