<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on Clarification of Reasons for Denial
Chuck ,Tim, all,
Agree on the consensus - as I already responded to Chuck, although I must have
missed the "reply all" button.
As to the participation list in the report - it lists all subscribers to the
mailing list, although only a (varying) subset thereof took part in the calls
(as also appears from the meeting notes on the Wiki)
Best regards
Olof
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 4:54 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx; Olof Nordling; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on
Clarification of Reasons for Denial
Thanks Tim. That is consistent with what I thought and what Olof confirmed and
is information that I think is helpful for us as a Council to know. It appears
to me that this could be an easy action item for the Council in Paris.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:35 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx; Olof Nordling; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on
Clarification of Reasons for Denial
Chuck,
We probably should have included that in the report. Others can correct me if
I'm wrong, but I believe in the end we all were in agreement on the
recommendations.
Note that although Paul S., Ross, and Taryn are listed as RrC participants I do
not recall them having been on the calls or voicing support one way or the
other. Paul D. and I did reach out to the RrC as best we could for any
concerns, but several RrC members were involved in the previous work that had
been done on the subject and registrar views were very well known by Paul and
myself and the other RrC members who participated on the drafting team.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on
Clarification of Reasons for Denial
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, June 05, 2008 9:48 am
To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>,
<council@gnso.icann<mailto:council@gnso.icann>.org>
Cc: <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
Thank you very much Olof. What was the level of support in the small group for
the recommendations?
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:13 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-trans-pdp] Report from Drafting Group on Clarification of
Reasons for Denial
Dear Councilors,
On behalf of the Chair, Mike O'Connor, and the whole Drafting Group, please
find attached the Final Draft from the Group, for your consideration and
decisions on how to proceed. The Final Draft is also available on the Drafting
Group's Wiki, at https://st.icann.org/irt-pdp/index.cgi?final_draft .
Very best regards
Olof
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|