<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] ICANN Board response to GAC recommendations
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board response to GAC recommendations
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:16:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: <C26E8B6A-D5E4-44BC-9982-AB3039D97DE4@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcjCbhxbLjaiQdMjSc67631RNnhXYAAAnFFQ
- Thread-topic: [council] ICANN Board response to GAC recommendations
Sounds reasonable to me.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:53 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] ICANN Board response to GAC recommendations
>
> Hi,
>
> The following message from Peter to the GAC relating to Whois
> studies has been forward to me by Suzanne Sene for
> circulation to the council.
>
> I believe that in addition to discussing IDNccTLD issues in
> our Sunday afternoon interaction with the GAC, we should be
> ready to discuss the question of Whois studies and get their
> feedback on the proposals we will be considering at the GNSO
> council meeting on the 25th.
>
> a.
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|