<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Fast Flux Charter
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Fast Flux Charter
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:07:10 -0700
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702452B6C@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcjBNg6LPob5H5DHShOmTnPlDfPydAAE6VNg
I am fine with these suggestions, except would delete "at the edge" from the
last addition.
Thx,
Mike
_____
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:45 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Fast Flux Charter
Importance: High
I would like to suggest the following changes to the Fast Flux charter.
Regarding the questions that are part of the Charter:
From: How are registry operators involved in fast flux hosting activities?
To: Are registry operators involved in fast flux hosting activities? If
so, how?
From: How are registrars involved in fast flux hosting activities?
To: Are registrars involved in fast flux hosting activities? If so, how?
After: What would be the impact (positive or negative) of establishing
limitations, guidelines, or restrictions on registrants, registrars and/or
registries with respect to practices that enable or facilitate fast flux
hosting?
Add: What would be the impact of these limitations, guidelines, or
restrictions to product and service innovation at the edge?
Chuck Gomes
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|