ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fast Flux Charter

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fast Flux Charter
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:45:29 -0400
  • Importance: high
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcjBNg6LPob5H5DHShOmTnPlDfPydA==
  • Thread-topic: Fast Flux Charter

I would like to suggest the following changes to the Fast Flux charter.
 
Regarding the questions that are part of the Charter:

 

From: How are registry operators involved in fast flux hosting
activities? 

To:  Are registry operators involved in fast flux hosting activities?
If so, how?

 

From: How are registrars involved in fast flux hosting activities?

To:  Are registrars involved in fast flux hosting activities? If so,
how?

 

After:  What would be the impact (positive or negative) of establishing
limitations, guidelines, or restrictions on registrants, registrars
and/or registries with respect to practices that enable or facilitate
fast flux hosting?

Add:  What would be the impact of these limitations, guidelines, or
restrictions to product and service innovation at the edge?

Chuck Gomes



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>