RE: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report

["Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The same issue was raised at our table Avri.

I believe your suggested change would be appropriate.

Regards,

Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com

The information contained in this communication is intended for the
named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain
legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error,
please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, 11 February 2008 12:59 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report


Hi,

At my table this evening, we had a conversation about Executive  
summary point #5 - specifically the last phrase "... without GNSO's  
concurrence"

While explaning it this, I explained that it really refered to the  
need to have have resolved the issue as explained in #2 and the ICANn  
community had  achieved a common agreement of an interim procedure.

I am wondering whether we might be to change it to say: " without  
prior community concurrence"

thanks

a.