AW: [council] Draft Motion for Approval of GNSO Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs

["Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>]

Hello,
 
will the final repsone be circulated in the council session on Wednesday
before we have a vote on it?
 
Best,
 
tom 

  _____  

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008 22:23
An: Council GNSO
Betreff: [council] Draft Motion for Approval of GNSO Response to ccNSO/GAC
Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs


Attached is a draft motion for action by the Council in our 13 February
meeting in New Delhi regarding the GNSO Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper
on IDN ccTLDs.  I also pasted it below.
 
Glen - please post this at all appropriate places on the website including
in the newly initiated work space.
 
My apologies for the length of the motion but I decided that it would be
helpful for us to capture the full history of this effort.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 
 

Draft Motion for Approval of the GNSO Response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper
on IDN ccTLDs

 

Proposed by Chuck Gomes, 3 Feb 2008

 

Whereas in July 2007 the ccNSO and GAC prepared a joint paper titled "Issues
Paper - Selection of IDN ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1 two letter
codes" (Issues Paper) which can be found at
http://www.icann.org/topics/idn/ccnso-gac-issues-report-on-idn-09jul07.pdf ,

 

Whereas on 29 July 2007 the ICANN Board approved resolution 07.56
(http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-29jun07.htm#m ) requesting that
the GNSO provide the Board with responses to the published list of issues
and questions that need to be addressed in order to move forward with IDN
ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1 two-letter codes in a manner that
ensures the continued security and stability of the Internet,

 

Whereas on 29 June 2007 the ICANN Board approved resolution 07.57
(http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-29jun07.htm#m )requesting that the
GNSO work collaboratively with the ccNSO, GAC and ALAC to explore both an
interim and an overall approach to IDN ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1
two-letter codes,

 

Whereas on 12 July 2007 the GNSO Council initiated formation of a drafting
team to prepare possible responses to the Issues Report for consideration by
the Council (see Council minutes at
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-12jul07.shtml ),

 

Whereas Bilal Beirm (BC), Chuck Gomes (RyC), Mark McFadden (ISCPC), Olof
Nordling (ICANN), Sophia Bekele (NomCom Rep), Tan Tin Wee (NCUC) and Yoav
Keren (RC) successfully created draft responses to the Issues Report,

 

Whereas in the ICANN meetings in Los Angeles in October 2007 the GNSO
reviewed and discussed the draft responses to the Issues Report and
identified concerns that deserved further consideration,

 

Whereas on 20 November 2007 the GNSO Council initiated a second drafting
team to rework the draft responses in light of newly identified concerns
(see Council minutes at
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-20nov07.shtml ),

 

Whereas Belal Beirm (BC), Edmon Chung (RyC), Olga Cavalli (NomCom Rep), Tina
Dam (ICANN), Avri Doria (NomCom Rep), Liz Gasster (ICANN), Chuck Gomes
(RyC), Adrian Kinderis (RC), Stefanie Lai (NCUC), Denise Michel (ICANN), and
Olof Nordling (ICANN) successfully reworked the draft responses to the
Issues Report,

 

Whereas on 10 February 2008 in New Delhi the GNSO reviewed and discussed the
reworked draft responses to the Issues Report,

 

Whereas on 11 February 2008 the GNSO Council participated in a joint meeting
with the ccNSO Council to discuss community concerns regarding the
introduction of IDN TLDs,

 

Whereas in the open GNSO Council meeting in New Delhi on 13 February 2008
public discussion of the reworked draft responses was held,

 

Resolved that the GNSO Council expresses sincere appreciation for all the
members of the two drafting teams as well as all other members of the
community who provided input,

 

Resolved that the GNSO Council approves the reworked draft responses as
edited in response to GNSO review and discussion that occurred on 10
February, as edited in response to input received in the joint ccNSO/GNSO
Council meeting held on 11 February and as edited in response to public
input in the open GNSO Council meeting on 13 February,

 

Resolved that the approved draft responses be sent not later than 14
February 2008 to the ICANN Board per the Board's request in resolution 07.56
as well as to the public comment forum titled 'Introduction of IDN ccTLDs'
at http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-19dec07.htm .