ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Domain Tasting - Follow up on possibility of fee application through interim or special budget process

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Domain Tasting - Follow up on possibility of fee application through interim or special budget process
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:21:08 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C727047AAB5B@cbiexm04dc.cov.co m>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C727047AAB5B@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

My understanding of what Denise said was that ICANN is proposing to levy the per-domain fee as part of the standard budget cycle which would put it in place starting July 2008. I heard nothing today about any interim measures.

Alan

At 17/01/2008 10:55 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

All,
Our discussion today of application of the ICANN fee to names deleted during AGP focused on the regular ICANN budget cycle. I had understood from our 31 October meeting that it may be possible to pursue levying the fee through an interim or special budgeting process, and that we would receive from staff further information about that possibility and a potential timetable.

I don't recall receiving any further information. Did we receive it? If so, would someone please point it out for me? If we didn't, I believe it would be helpful to have before Delhi. To the extent it can be provided quickly, it would be especially helpful for the design team to have before Delhi.

Thanks.
Kristina


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>