ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform


hi,

seems simpler and more understandable.

while my tortured sense of logic was fine with the other, i see why this is more understandable especially since we then go and give our qualification.

thanks

a.

On 26 nov 2007, at 20.35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

So we are sayiing "we unanimously partially support the recommendation"? Sounds a little confusing to me. At the same time, note that in my response to Philip just sent a couple minutes ago, I suggested "Qualified Support". I think it may be an improvement to say "we unanimously support a recommendation with qualifications".



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>