Re: [council] Proposed endgame motion for Whois Task Force - with Whereas'es

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I second the motion to expedite the process by three days. This seems
absoletely reasonable to me since it will enable the council to finish
its work on this PDP at the LA meeting.

Best,

tom

Am 31.08.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
> Philip Sheppard wrote:
> >I formally oppose the suggestion to shorten the public comment period 
> >timetable proposed by
> >the Council chair.
> >
> >Unseemly haste on this most high profile of issues is unwise.
> 
> I believe that the proper process is to request a second on the 
> amendment and then put it to a vote. If the amendment is viewed as 
> unfriendly, it would be voted on separately, IIRC.
> 
> If you don't agree with the amendment, then vote against it. If it 
> becomes part of the motion and you are still uncomfortable with it, then 
> vote against the whole package or make a counter-motion.
> 
> Also, I'd note that tightening up the schedule by three business days is 
> hardly "unseemly haste", although I do applaud the breadth of your 
> rhetorical skills.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> Tucows Inc.
> 
> http://www.domaindirect.com
> t. 416.538.5492
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w