<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed endgame motion for Whois Task Force - with Whereas'es
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed endgame motion for Whois Task Force - with Whereas'es
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:02:55 +0200
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Proposed Text for motion to be voted on September 6 2007
---------------------------------------------------------
Whereas the Whois Task force report has not yet been voted on as
required
by the by-laws,
Whereas the Whois WG was created to collect further information as
defined in its terms of reference,
Whereas the Whois WG has now completed its work,
Whereas almost 6 months have gone by since the release of the Whois
Task force report,
Proposed:
The GSNO Council should now complete this work on Whois and make its
report to the ICANN
community and to the ICANN Board.
In order to complete the work the following steps will be taken as
scheduled:
1 - Staff will produce a Draft Final Report that references the TF
report, the WG charter
and the WG report by and which includes an overall description
of the
process by September 13. This overview should include the text
of motions to
be voted on at the end of this process.
2 - This report will be sent out for Constituency Statement Review on
September 13.
Constituencies will be asked to follow the by-laws on
constituency statements.
Specifically :
1. Constituency Statements.
The Representatives will each be responsible for soliciting
the position of their constituencies, at a minimum, and other
comments as each Representative deems appropriate, regarding
the issue under consideration. This position and other
comments,
as applicable, should be submitted in a formal statement to the
task force chair (each, a "Constituency Statement") within
thirty-five
(35) calendar days after initiation of the PDP.
Every Constituency Statement shall include at least the
following:
(i) If a Supermajority Vote was reached, a clear statement
of the
constituency's position on the issue;
(ii) If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear
statement of
all positions espoused by constituency members;
(iii) A clear statement of how the constituency arrived at
its position(s).
Specifically, the statement should detail specific
constituency meetings,
teleconferences, or other means of deliberating an
issue, and a list of
all members who participated or otherwise submitted
their views;
(iv) An analysis of how the issue would affect the
constituency, including any
financial impact on the constituency; and
(v) An analysis of the period of time that would likely be
necessary to
implement the policy.
Final Date for for updated statement: October 4, 2007
which is 35 days from the meeting when the Whois WG
report was discussed
3 - Staff will Incorporate Constituency comments into Final Report by
October 11, 2007
4 - Staff is requested to produce staff implementation notes by
October 15
5 - Community Public Comment on Final Report: October 15 - November
6, 2007
6 - A Public and Council Discussion will be held during the LA Public
Meeting
7 - Final vote on first GNSO Council meeting after November 6, 2007
---------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|