ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Proposed endgame motion for Whois Task Force - with Whereas'es

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Proposed endgame motion for Whois Task Force - with Whereas'es
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:02:55 +0200
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Proposed Text for motion to be voted on September 6 2007
---------------------------------------------------------

Whereas the Whois Task force report has not yet been voted on as required
by the by-laws,

Whereas the Whois WG was created to collect further information as
defined in its terms of reference,

Whereas the Whois WG has now completed its work,

Whereas almost 6 months have gone by since the release of the Whois
Task force report,

Proposed:

The GSNO Council should now complete this work on Whois and make its report to the ICANN
community and to the ICANN Board.

In order to complete the work the following steps will be taken as scheduled:

1 - Staff will produce a Draft Final Report that references the TF report, the WG charter and the WG report by and which includes an overall description of the process by September 13. This overview should include the text of motions to
    be voted on at the end of this process.


2 - This report will be sent out for Constituency Statement Review on September 13. Constituencies will be asked to follow the by-laws on constituency statements.
    Specifically :
        1. Constituency Statements.
        The Representatives will each be responsible for soliciting
        the position of their constituencies, at a minimum, and other
        comments as each Representative deems appropriate, regarding
the issue under consideration. This position and other comments,
        as applicable, should be submitted in a formal statement to the
task force chair (each, a "Constituency Statement") within thirty-five
        (35) calendar days after initiation of the PDP.
Every Constituency Statement shall include at least the following:

(i) If a Supermajority Vote was reached, a clear statement of the
            constituency's position on the issue;

(ii) If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear statement of
            all positions espoused by constituency members;

(iii) A clear statement of how the constituency arrived at its position(s). Specifically, the statement should detail specific constituency meetings, teleconferences, or other means of deliberating an issue, and a list of all members who participated or otherwise submitted their views;

(iv) An analysis of how the issue would affect the constituency, including any
             financial impact on the constituency; and

(v) An analysis of the period of time that would likely be necessary to
             implement the policy.

        Final Date for for updated statement: October 4, 2007
which is 35 days from the meeting when the Whois WG report was discussed

3 - Staff will Incorporate Constituency comments into Final Report by October 11, 2007

4 - Staff is requested to produce staff implementation notes by October 15

5 - Community Public Comment on Final Report: October 15 - November 6, 2007

6 - A Public and Council Discussion will be held during the LA Public Meeting

7 - Final vote on first GNSO Council meeting after November 6, 2007


---------------------------




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>