<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference 12 April 2007
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference 12 April 2007
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:41:13 -0400
- Cc: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <464CA818.7090504@tucows.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AceYtsBg4LkCONKbTcOzufO5jQguswABItpg
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference 12 April 2007
Thanks Ross. That is what I thought.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:08 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council
> teleconference 12 April 2007
>
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > I must have been sleeping during the discussion about the
> Transfer Policy Review Committee. I didn't understand that
> the committee had completed its work and had final
> recommendations to submit to the Council. I thought that the
> committee was going to reconvene and pick up where they left
> off and then submit recommendations to the Council. Am I
> incorrect here? One of the issues that created a lot of
> problems with regard to transfer disputes had to do with
> registrant transfers happening at the same time or in near
> proximity to registrar changes; I don't believe that the
> committee finalized recommendations in that regard.
>
> To clarify - a set of recommendations has been drafted, which
> requires a final review by the commitee. These will be
> reviewed and forwarded to council prior to the June meeting in PR.
>
> -r
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|