Re: [council] Term of the next GNSO Council chair

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It is the same for the RC.

Best,

tom

Am 16.04.2007 schrieb Gomes, Chuck:
> I can only speak for the RyC.  Our reps vote the wishes of the
> constituency.  It is possible for a split vote if for example the
> interests of the sTLDs were different than the uTLDs, but I do not think
> that has ever happened.
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:18 PM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: Re: [council] Term of the next GNSO Council chair
> > 
> > 
> > On 16 apr 2007, at 14.10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > 
> > > Assuming that Council reps, with the exception of the NomComm 
> > > appointees, would be voting the wishes of their constituencies,
> > 
> > 
> > a question on this:
> > 
> > On votes like this, do constituencies always mandate the 
> > voting of the representatives, or do they ever leave it open 
> > for the representative to voter her or his preference, e.g. 
> > was the vote for seat 13, by constituency or by council 
> > member?  Are there occasions where a constituency is split on 
> > candidates?  what happens in those cases - due they do a 
> > mandated split of the vote, i.e. reps a, b vote for x and 
> > repc vote for y?
> > 
> > a.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w