Re: [council] Next GNSO Council chair - and Vice-chairs ?

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support the idea of council vice-chairs to distribute both the 
workload and the power of the chairmanship to other councilors.
I think that the vice-chair should be the person with the 2nd most votes 
in the final round of voting for chairman. 

We should examine appropriate checks and balances of power within 
council as part of the over-all GNSO review and improvements.
Robin



Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> I personally think that the idea of a chair and one or two vice chairs
> is worth discussing further for possible usage in the remainder of
> Bruce's term (until the annual meeting).  As Philip indicates, it might
> be a reasonable way to better distribute the work load of Council
> leadership.  It would also allow some time for the work of the Board
> Governance committee regarding the GNSO review to progress and at the
> same time give us some time to test the idea.
>
> I like Philip am interested in what others think.
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>
>  
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:19 AM
> > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [council] Next GNSO Council chair - and Vice-chairs ?
> >
> >
> > I am comfortable with the idea of the next appointment being 
> > till after the AGM - to help synchronise the term.
> > Let me start on list, a discussion we had face to face with 
> > some council members in Lisbon and the idea of both a chair 
> > and one or two vice chairs also.
> > I see this model working well for a few reasons:
> > - clear responsibility for deputising for chair when the 
> > chair cannot make a meeting/call for any reason;
> > - a vice chair could also chair any committees of the whole 
> > if convened in future;
> > - at a time of multiple overlapping issues, vice chairs could 
> > be given an issue responsibility to help oversee not the 
> > policy (that would be the TF chair) but any administrative 
> > and coordination questions (especially useful when the TF 
> > chair is not a council member).
> > There is nothing in the by-laws to prevent us from such appointments.
> > What do other Council members think ?
> > Philip
> >
> >
> >    
>