RE: [council] Draft Motion for Extension of RN-WG

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,
 
That was the direction we received from Bruce as the Council chair in at
least two different meetings in the past seven days with no objections
from anyone on the Council except you unless I missed something.  I
agree with the decision as you know, but that is beside the point; I
believe it would now be up to the Council to change it.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
        Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 7:52 AM
        To: GNSO Council
        Subject: FW: [council] Draft Motion for Extension of RN-WG
        
        

        Thx Chuck. 

         

        I have an issue with considering 'registry-specific names' and
'other reserved names' as 'out of scope'.  I think that, at least, the
WG should attempt to reach consensus on general principles such as:  "to
the extent the registry will reserve names for itself or for later
disposition after initial launch, the registry must commit in its
application to a general description of the types of names that will be
reserved, and a general description of how and when such domains will be
released.  During the post-contract, pre-launch phase, the registry
shall commit to a specific plan for disposition of such names within
five years."

         

        Mike Rodenbaugh

        Sr. Legal Director

        Yahoo! Inc.

         

        NOTICE:  This communication is confidential and may be protected
by attorney-client and/or work product privilege.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify me by reply, and delete this
communication and any attachments.

        
________________________________


        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:32 AM
        To: GNSO Council
        Subject: [council] Draft Motion for Extension of RN-WG

         

        Here's some possible language that could be incorporated into a
motion to extend the RN-WG.

         

        Chuck Gomes

         

        "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."