RE: [council] Regarding dealing with inappropriate behaviour

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Points taken Avri.  I certainly wouldn't advocate spending an excessive
amount of time on this. If we can't come up a relatively simple
procedure including fairly simple appeal process, then we probably
should just wait until a problem occurs and react.  The difficulty with
that is that it takes longer to deal with a problem if there is one.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:44 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Regarding dealing with inappropriate behaviour
> 
> 
> On 2 mar 2007, at 12.10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > For those of us who have been around for awhile, we have definitely 
> > encountered situtations where group members were not 
> constructive but 
> > rather were disruptive.
> 
> Over two decades in the IETF certainly taught me that.  But 
> it also taught me that often the judgement between constructive and  
> disruptive was subjective and a matter of 'political' perspective.   
> It also taught me that unless there are formal processes and 
> procedures as well as levels of appeal, the solution is often 
> far worse then the infraction.
> 
> Unfortunately the time spent developing such procedures is 
> also often far more destructive and time consuming then just 
> learning to ignore the trolls.
> 
> 
> a.
> 
> 
>