<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed, Revised ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement
- To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed, Revised ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:19:38 +1100
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AccxXeAUnxXYMcluSjaSMGO/0QigfABS+vHg
- Thread-topic: Proposed, Revised ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Pritz
Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2007 5:42 PM
To: Bruce Tonkin; Chris Disspain
Cc: John Jeffrey; Paul Twomey; Paul Levins; Doug Brent
Subject: Proposed, Revised ICM (.XXX) Registry Agreement
Bruce, Chris:
For the information of the members of the Supporting Organisations:
Please note the posting of the revised, proposed .XXX registry agreement
(www.icann.org).
Since the ICANN Board voted not to approve the previously proposed .XXX
registry agreement, registry sponsor ICM has proposed changes (described
in the posting) to address the issues raised by the GAC in their
communique and in public comment. ICM and ICANN staff have discussed
those issues and potential changes since the last Board vote and this
version of the agreement is a result of those discussions.
The posting describes the background regarding the ICM application and
provides links to past and current pertinent documents. There are also
links to descriptions and annotations to the changes made to the
proposed agreement. In particular, the recently posted status document
at http://www.icann.org/announcements/
announcement-04jan07.htm describes how this step "fits into" the
remainder of the sTLD round.
ICANN staff can provide additional detail.
Please contact John Jeffrey or me with questions, comments, and requests
for clarification.
Sincerely,
Kurt
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|