<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding voting rules at the Council
- To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Regarding voting rules at the Council
- From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:58:54 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YS4eLL26M8voXa5tAo/0DiiRaJ6hhylNqKREaUF1DLlyNAPoE+80PUI97b6fssb9CumjLYC2oU5sVfGI+5ZlVXxsUORdzK+Y4Ddam2MEljFgNprwF6zxglwkFauQFfQ4oQRlM1sAF9B6Ws+HJEKMAfV/T04nE/MxMiIw5RKh67Y= ;
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540384688F@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So you are saying, I think, that we should use the existing bylaws
unchanged to conduct the GNSO review and only when that is done should
we change the bylaws. First complete GNSO Review, then bylaws
modification. Is that correct?
Greg
--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> At various times it has been stated that the original intent was to
> only
> have weighted voting for policy matters, however we are operating
> under
> the current bylaws. I would assume a review of this issue would be
> part of the process for making changes to the bylaws following the
> GNSO review.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|