<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006
- To: "Mawaki Chango" <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006
- From: "Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:40:24 -0700
- Cc: Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lASX6VXIIHCQbi77Y3+VLQ16hQ9Udvo08caAwfjn4eRxvwF/N8DjPr6qrlL7hpcKeD2ETPzZN9xf4WnoO9Lcm4/4A6V/bVTvwq8jC7h/v6KouKo+nRyGwrqcGr6oervYrRTjsjvaSpivK6WnDBGTudDXBzS6NXbXwd1XG3ca4G8=
- In-reply-to: <20060404215632.76024.qmail@web54713.mail.yahoo.com>
- References: <D981DAC077157C4098098372A7349D7D0356BE01@daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com> <20060404215632.76024.qmail@web54713.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mawaki,
We may be all in the same boat with you as to why 'Council should be
involved'. But the proposal came from Kiyoshi I. Tsuru - Intellectual
Property Interests Constituency. Maybe Kiyoshi can clarify further for you
about his proposal.
regards,
Sophia
On 04/04/06, Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Lucy for your effort in an attempt to reply to my question.
> However, I'm still not sure if this addresses my lack of information.
> I seem to know what WIPO is, and I have a bunch of guesses for DRP
> (one of which is dispute resolution policy?) and for IGOs (one of
> which is inter-governmental organizations?), but I still don't
> understand why GNSO Council has a briefing about the "Paris
> Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property" on a call at
> this point in time, and not even (based on your answer) who is
> concerned with developing a DRP for IGOs and what could be the
> business of the council in this, if any.
>
> Mawaki
>
> --- Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > This refers to WIPO-II and concerns whether or not there is a legal
> > basis for developing a DRP for IGOs.
> >
> > Lucy
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > >Behalf Of ext Mawaki Chango
> > >Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:54 PM
> > >To: Council GNSO
> > >Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12
> > April
> > 2006
> > >
> > >Hello Bruce,
> > >
> > >Maybe this is relevant only for those who were not in Wellington:
> > >could we have a couple of sentences as to why we're having item 3
> > on
> > >the agenda? thanks, Mawaki
> > >
> > >--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>>
> > >> Item 3: Briefing by General Counsel's office on implications of
> > >> Article 6ter(1)(a) and (b) of the Paris Convention for the
> > >> Protection of Industrial Property:
> > >>
> >
> >http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/trtdocs_wo020.html#P155_22332
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> This convention dates back to 1883 and was last amended in 1979.
> > >>
> > >> Note that the States that are signatories of this convention
> > are:
> > >> http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/documents/pdf/d-paris.pdf
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|