<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006
- To: <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006
- From: <Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:24:31 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20060404115422.72731.qmail@web54703.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcZX4t2j9qYp+GI5SOW62/EQ+nFgNgAIRw1Q
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006
This refers to WIPO-II and concerns whether or not there is a legal
basis for developing a DRP for IGOs.
Lucy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of ext Mawaki Chango
>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:54 PM
>To: Council GNSO
>Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April
2006
>
>Hello Bruce,
>
>Maybe this is relevant only for those who were not in Wellington:
>could we have a couple of sentences as to why we're having item 3 on
>the agenda? thanks, Mawaki
>
>--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>
>> Item 3: Briefing by General Counsel's office on implications of
>> Article 6ter(1)(a) and (b) of the Paris Convention for the
>> Protection of Industrial Property:
>>
>http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/trtdocs_wo020.html#P155_22332
>>
>>
>> This convention dates back to 1883 and was last amended in 1979.
>>
>> Note that the States that are signatories of this convention are:
>> http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/documents/pdf/d-paris.pdf
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|