ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Status of meeting planning for Feb 2006 in Washington

  • To: <ck@nic.museum>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Status of meeting planning for Feb 2006 in Washington
  • From: <Lucy.Nichols@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:46:52 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <43D6017E.8070705@nic.museum>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYg0ggnRNDJsWznQJO8JvE27GN1QAACcYOQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] Status of meeting planning for Feb 2006 in Washington

Either location is fine with me.

Lucy 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Cary Karp
>Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:29 PM
>To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [council] Status of meeting planning for Feb 2006 
>in Washington
>
>> current date under consideration is around 21 Feb 2006
>
>There are several other events in Europe close to this time 
>and I would not be able to make a meeting in Washington DC on 
>that date.
>
>> how about relocating the meeting to Frankfurt. I haven't ask but I'm 
>> sure DENIC would certainly provide us with a meeting accomodation.
>> The DENIC headquarter is about 15 Minutes away from the 
>airport and in 
>> walking reach of several adequate hotels.
>
>For obvious reasons, this venue would be preferable for me. 
>What would the difference in aggregate travel distance be for 
>the entire Council if we were to meet in Germany rather than in the US?
>
>/Cary
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>