ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council meeting - Tuesday 7 February 2006

  • To: <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council meeting - Tuesday 7 February 2006
  • From: <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:57:49 -0000
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcYdvN1FiQOs0mN/R8O2K9E+N0fEiAASEtAQAH1p9PA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council meeting - Tuesday 7 February 2006

I could make Monday 1/6, but not Tuesday as I'll be involved in an ETSI
meeting that evening. 

Can't speak for the other ISPCP members, both are away on holiday at the
moment.

Tony

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: 20 January 2006 21:06
To: 'Thomas Keller'; 'Bruce Tonkin'
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council meeting - Tuesday 7
February 2006

I'm reluctant to move it farther out. How about Monday? 1/6? 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 7:26 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council meeting - Tuesday 7
February 2006

Bruce, 

holding a additional meeting (or even more than one) is certainly a good
idea but having it on the same day as the start of the .eu Sunrise 2
might prevent me from participating. Could we reschedule this meeting to
another day?

Best,

tom

Am 20.01.2006 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> Hello All,
> 
> In view of the need to keep the work going on the topic of policy
issues
> arising from the proposed changes to the .com agreement, as well as
the
> work on new gTLDs, I recommend that we schedule another conference
call
> following receipt of the Issues Report, and following the conclusion
of
> the period for constituency statements on new gTLDS.
> 
> 
> Draft Agenda for Council meeting Tuesday 7 February 2006
> 
> Coordinated Universal Time UTC 19:00
> 
> (11am Los Angeles, 2pm Washington DC, 7pm London, 6am (next day)
> Melbourne ) 
> 
> Item 1: Approval of minutes of 17 January 2006
> 
> Item 2: Issues Report on policy issues raised in the proposed .com
> agreement
> - consider the issues report (due 1 Feb 2006)
> - decide whether to initiate the PDP
> (see "Initiation of PDP" in section 3, Annex A, of the ICANN bylaws)
> 
> Item 3: Initial Report on new gTLDs
> - consider cosnsitutency statements and public comments (due 31 Jan
> 2006)
> - discuss content of Initial Report (due on 15 Feb 2006)
> (see section 8 (c), Annex A, of the ICANN bylaws)
> 
> Item 4: Next meeting - 21 Feb 2006
> - Consider holding a two day physical meeting around 21 Feb 2006 in
> Washington, DC to advance the work on policy issues in items 2 and 3
> above
> - note the Final Report on new gTLDs is due on 15 March 2006
> (see section 9 (c), Annex A, of the ICANN bylaws)
> 
> Item 5: Any other business
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w  




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>