RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council teleconference - Thursday 17 Feb 2005

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce, I would expect that we could use about 15 minutes for the report on
the Amsterdam Consultation. I will prepare a very few PP summarizing the
meeting's outputs and send to the Councilors who helped to organize: Tony,
Lucy, Ross, Ken, yourself, Marilyn, and the co-moderators, Philip and Grant,
for review before the meeting. It will explain the outputs, and timelines.

We should in our meeting, also thank the ICANN staff who were available, and
contributed both in the presentation and throughout the meeting, and also
thank Paul Twomey who made opening comments on Day one. As well as the other
members of the community who participated with us.  

As an FYI, there will also be a meeting report that will be sent out Friday,
2/11, for review by all participants, and Glen will post to the Council list
as well, for full information for the Councilors where weren't able to
attend in person.  Grant and I have done a good deal of drafting on a
meeting report so far, and I've had contributions from the rapporteurs
outputs. 

Thanks to everyone who helped to organize and participated, both Councilors,
and ICANN staff, for all your help and wise counsel along the way. Everyone
made themselves flexibly available and were very responsive as the agenda
and format was developed. Of course our work isn't over on input and
consultation; however, it was really a pleasure to work with other
Councilors and constituency members, as well as the broader community and
ICANN staff in organizing and supporting the Amsterdam meeting. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:44 PM
To: Bruce Tonkin; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Kurt Pritz; Paul Verhoef; Barbara Roseman; gnso.icann; Tim Cole; Tina
Dam
Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council teleconference -
Thursday 17 Feb 2005

Note that the ICANN staff are currently conducting a review of the
transfers policy.
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-12jan05.htm

We can discuss progress on this under item 6 of the Agenda.

Regards,
Bruce
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Monday, 7 February 2005 10:11 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Kurt Pritz; Paul Verhoef; Barbara Roseman; gnso.icann; 
> Tim Cole; Tina Dam
> Subject: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO Council 
> teleconference - Thursday 17 Feb 2005
> 
> Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 17 February 2005
> 
> Coordinated Universal Time UTC 19:00
> 
> (11am Los Angeles, 2pm Washington DC, 7pm London, 6am (next 
> day) Melbourne ) 
> 
> Item 1: Approval of minutes
> 
> Item 2: Report on Amsterdam Consultation on the ICANN 
> Strategic Plan 7-8 February 2005
> 
> Item 3: Update on procedure for use by ICANN in considering 
> requests for consent and related contractual amendments to
> allow changes in the architecture and operation of a gTLD registry.   
> 
> Item 4: Update on WHOIS task forces
> 
> 
> Item 5: Election for ICANN Board seat #14 (currently held by Michael
> Palage)
> - the GNSO Council must affirm the vote of Board Seat #14 no 
> later than
> 5 May 2005
> - the elected Board member takes up seat #14 on 5 June 2005
> - Proposed process:
> 
> -- Call for nominations: Friday 11 March 2005 Call to be sent 
> out on Council list.
> (only Council members, based on consultation with their 
> constituencies, can nominate)
> -- End of nominations: Friday 25 March 2005
> -- hold election in person at the GNSO Council meeting in Mar 
> del Plata,
> 6 April 2005
> (note a majority of the Council votes must be in favour of 
> the successful candidate - this may require multiple rounds of voting)
> 
> 
> Item 6: Report from ICANN staff on current complaints raised 
> by Internet users and registrants
> 
> Item 7: Update from ICANN staff on new appointments, and 
> plans for issues report on re-registration of recently deleted names
> 
> Item 8: Any other business
> 
> 
>