<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] WHOIS TF 1: Question to GNSO Council regarding timelines
- To: "council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Barbara Roseman (E-mail)" <roseman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] WHOIS TF 1: Question to GNSO Council regarding timelines
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:27:30 -0500
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcPEk9M/mwJmvWXcSquMl2/vpv4fSAAHYGiQ
- Thread-topic: [council] WHOIS TF 1: Question to GNSO Council regarding timelines
I suggest that Barbara Roseman, as staff manager to the WHOIS TFs, should
present a paper document for Council, outlining the TFs proposed timelines, so
that we are looking at something written. Oral reports about calendar dates
are hard to follow online....Overall, I support the need to provide extended
time frames, within the steps outlined by the PDP.
However, for a longer term consideration, it may at some point be necessary to
modify the PDP. I am not suggesting that Council make that decision at this
time, but as those responsible for policy development on gTLDs, Council may
need at some point to consider modifications to the PDP. I don't mean to open
that topic to discussion at this time, merely to note it to fellow Councilors.
Finally, we need to ensure that the needed and expected staff support from
ICANN is understood by both ICANN and by the TFs. Timely responses and
turnaround on work will be critical, and we do have many, and perhaps
overlapping demands for work.
mcade@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:49 AM
To: council
Subject: [council] WHOIS TF 1: Question to GNSO Council regarding timelines
I support the proposal to extend the timeline for the PDP of WHOIS TF1 but the
steps on the described TF1 timetable do not agree with the PDP. As someone
involved in the drafting of the PDP text our understanding was that its
timelines were guidelines that may need to be adapted by intelligent users. But
its steps should be followed.
.
It is worth pointing out that the PDP article 7e tells us that the TF has 50
days (40+5+5) to get a report out for public comment. There is then 20+10 = 30
days to get a final report to Council. The total time = 80 days.
.
(It would be useful if the GNSO secretariat were to keep a record of each
ACTUAL timeline of all PDPs, so that we can include the PDP deadlines in the
GNSO review later this year. If we then need to change the deadlines, we can do
so).
Philip
Find the PDP at
http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-26jun03.htm#AnnexA
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|