<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Attendance at Council meetings
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Attendance at Council meetings
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:36:19 +0200
- Cc: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx'" <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>, "'twomey@xxxxxxxxx'" <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, "'ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <A9DECB0B8A01A54DBECC03B25D29513CABFFA2@stntexch03.va.neustar.com>
- Mail-followup-to: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, 'Bruce Tonkin' <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx'" <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>, "'twomey@xxxxxxxxx'" <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, "'ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <A9DECB0B8A01A54DBECC03B25D29513CABFFA2@stntexch03.va.neustar.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On 2003-10-15 09:22:09 -0500, Jeff Neuman wrote:
> In addition, I would like to raise another concern involving
> openness and transparency. It has come to our attention that the
> Business Constituency has attempted to arrange a private meeting
> during the Tunisia meeting with several other constituencies
> (including the ISPs, the Registrars, the ALAC, etc.) to discuss
> the Wildcard Service and introduction of registry services in
> general.
The meeting that's being planned in cooperation with the ALAC is
supposed to be an information and discussion event that is open to
the public; there is no interest in excluding any individual
constituency.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|