ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

tf2-sg2


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?


Hi Thomas:

For some reason, I didn't receive your earlier message. I'm in the midst of a bit of an e-mail migration, though, so it may have arrived in the midst of that.

I agree that we should have a call and need to put together some of the data that we've seen thus far. Does anyone have availability tomorrow? Unfortunately, I have a pretty narrow window of opportunity, from about 8 AM until 11 AM Eastern Time.

Jordyn

On Mar 18, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

I note, though, that there was no feed-back to my earlier suggestion
to set up a conference call for this sub-group.  If members are
currently unable to make the necessary time commitments, I'd suggest
that we get back to the entire task force with these news and try to
draft some more support.

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/






On 2004-03-17 09:36:20 +0100, GNSO Secretariat wrote:
From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:20 +0100
Subject: RE: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
Reply-To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Spam-Level:

Could it be this:
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00076.html
see also
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/raa-whois-16dec03.shtml

GNSO Secretariat

 mardi 16 mars 2004 11:28 Thomas Roessler a ecrit
Hello,

we should probably spend some time on figuring out what we report
back to the task force and the ICANN community at large on current
practice with respect to WHOIS.  I'd suggest we schedule a
conference call for some day later this week.

We will have to look at the material that we received pre Rome, and
the staff's report on registrars' current practice in implementing
policies related to notification of and consent by registrants.
(Glen, Barbara: Where's that report, again? I have the feeling that
I've received a copy some time ago, but have lost it.) Also, there's
a response from .pl directly to Task Force 3, and the CENTR survey
at <http://www.centr.org/meetings/ga-21/WHOIS-paper-v1.0.pdf>; see
also
<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00112.html>.









<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>