<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure
Am 19.01.2007 schrieb Tim Ruiz:
> I would think ICANN GC could come up with a base set of terms that cannot change without Board approval. Other than that, the draft procedure looks fine.<BR><BR>Tim <BR>
Isn't that what the FEB 06 Taskforce is not supposed to come up with?
Best,
tom
> <div name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR>From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Fri, January 19, 2007 8:18 am<BR>To: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>Thanks Tom.<BR><BR>
> No vote necessary -- just provide comments to the list and to ICANN.
> My<BR>
> only proposed change to the proposal is to add a standard for when
> these<BR>
> decisions should go to the Board. The current draft is
> too<BR>discretionary in that regard. <BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Jon<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx] <BR>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 AM<BR>To: Nevett, Jonathon<BR>Cc: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR><BR>
> Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept
> it<BR>and make it policy?<BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:<BR>> From ICANN for our review and comment. Thanks. Jon<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx] <BR>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM<BR>> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova<BR>
> > Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke;
> Craig<BR>Schwartz;<BR>> Dan Halloran<BR>> Subject: Draft Procedure<BR>> <BR>> Marie, Jon:<BR>> <BR>> Please share this information with your constituency groups.<BR>> <BR>
> > Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry
> proposals<BR><BR>
> > for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The
> <BR>
> > procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and
> <BR>> discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for<BR>consideration.<BR>> <BR>
> > This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that
> <BR>
> > requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft
> <BR>
> > procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed
> <BR>
> > changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly
> <BR>
> > resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the
> <BR>
> > procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes
> to<BR><BR>
> > agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board
> <BR>> approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.<BR>> <BR>> Please review and provide comment.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Kurt<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Kurt Pritz<BR>> <BR>> ICANN<BR>> 4676 Admiralty Way, #330<BR>> Marina del Rey. CA 90292<BR>> <BR>> +1.310.301.5809 (office)<BR>> +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)<BR>> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Gruss,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>(__) <BR>(OO)_____ <BR>(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR> | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!<BR> w w w w </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
>
>
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|