<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure
- To: "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:06:02 -0700
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.9.11
I would think ICANN GC could come up with a base set of terms that cannot change without Board approval. Other than that, the draft procedure looks fine.<BR><BR>Tim <BR>
<div name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR>From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Fri, January 19, 2007 8:18 am<BR>To: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>Thanks Tom.<BR><BR>
No vote necessary -- just provide comments to the list and to ICANN.
My<BR>
only proposed change to the proposal is to add a standard for when
these<BR>
decisions should go to the Board. The current draft is
too<BR>discretionary in that regard. <BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Jon<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx] <BR>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 AM<BR>To: Nevett, Jonathon<BR>Cc: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR><BR>
Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept
it<BR>and make it policy?<BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:<BR>> From ICANN for our review and comment. Thanks. Jon<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx] <BR>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM<BR>> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova<BR>
> Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke;
Craig<BR>Schwartz;<BR>> Dan Halloran<BR>> Subject: Draft Procedure<BR>> <BR>> Marie, Jon:<BR>> <BR>> Please share this information with your constituency groups.<BR>> <BR>
> Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry
proposals<BR><BR>
> for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The
<BR>
> procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and
<BR>> discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for<BR>consideration.<BR>> <BR>
> This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that
<BR>
> requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft
<BR>
> procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed
<BR>
> changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly
<BR>
> resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the
<BR>
> procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes
to<BR><BR>
> agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board
<BR>> approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.<BR>> <BR>> Please review and provide comment.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Kurt<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Kurt Pritz<BR>> <BR>> ICANN<BR>> 4676 Admiralty Way, #330<BR>> Marina del Rey. CA 90292<BR>> <BR>> +1.310.301.5809 (office)<BR>> +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)<BR>> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Gruss,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>(__) <BR>(OO)_____ <BR>(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR> | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!<BR> w w w w </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|