Re: [registrars] Improper Balloting

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim,

that is how I remind the result of that ballot as well (I voted against
it and was very disappointed that it passed but never mind .-))

tom

Am 20.09.2004 schrieb Tim Ruiz:
> Bob,
> 
> That's not correct. Please review the results again. 52% of the membership
> did vote, but 48% of those voting wanted the individual voting results to be
> available during the entire voting period.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 10:13 AM
> To: Registrars Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Improper Balloting
> 
> At 03:15 AM 9/20/04, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
> > > The result was that individual voting results would be
> > > published in real time during the entire voting period.
> > >
> > > However, on the new Chair ballot presented, I notice that the
> > > ballot and voting procedure is not adhering to this standard,
> > > namely that the results of the individual votes are being
> > > with-held until after the close of the auction.
> 
> Dear Tim: You misread the results.  52% voted against such a system.
> 
> Rick told us there was no alternative in Boardrooms.com but I find there is 
> considerable flexibility.  For example, Thomas  Mörz was among those who 
> asked that only the summary be made public.  I find that option also exists.
> 
> Regards, BobC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w