Re: [registrars] Re: Conference Call Invitation for 07/06/2004 01:30 PM

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 06:20 PM 7/4/04, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> Bob,
> this email is not against you it's just a alarm I tried to fire up in that 
> RC where everything seems so smooth but it's just an appearance.
> I think a 2 day notice for a conf call at 5:00am is not really friendly.
> Who and when this has been decided? Don't we have to take the decision in 
> a open and fair manner?
> Especially knowing that Bhavin is in ASIA choosing a non friendly time for 
> him is not really nice or it's made on purpose.
Dear Jean-Michel:

Here is the original request:

Subject: [rc-excom] FW: ICANN Budget issues
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:31:25 -0400

I was driving at the time, arrived at my destination at 23:30 PDT.  By the 
time I arranged for it, it was Saturday in Tokyo.
Look at the options, I don't have India on this chart but figure back from 
Singapore:
        http://psi-japan.com/gmtime99.html

See you in KL:-)  Regards, BobC

> Does it mean some people really don't agree with Bhavin?
> In that case it should be discussed openly.
> I really start to be fed up with the lack of communication in that 
> constituency and the lack of consideration.
> Several times I've asked we had a list of on going topics and to do 
> list...but I had no support nor follow up .. does it mean people are just 
> playing in their field and just don't care of the others ...in that case 
> I'm just wondering why we have a RC.
> I really think ExCom should talk *more* to us.
> Hope my signal has been heard at least I tried.
> Regards,
> Jean-Michel