<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- To: Jay Westerdal <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:25:23 -0400
- Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200405181817.i4IIHCB23906@holiday.com.at.spry.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <200405181817.i4IIHCB23906@holiday.com.at.spry.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (Windows/20040113)
On 5/18/2004 2:20 PM Jay Westerdal noted that:
It is about time Registries pay there fair share.
The registries aren't the problem. The address registries, ccTLDs and
other under-contributing parties are.
Let's stay focused on where the real problems are. I don't see the
registries as being the culprits here - or as a real source of alternate
funding that won't come out of our pockets anyways...
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|