RE: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment

["Donny Simonton" <donny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Be very happy, the numbers I first saw were $0.49 per transaction!

Donny

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patricio Valdes
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:53 PM
> To: Rick Wesson; Jean-Michel Becar
> Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
> 
> 
> Please tell me I read wrong, they want to charge a per transaction fee of
> $.25. On top of that, $4,000 a year for the accreditation plus $19,000 a
> year for the Variable Registrar Support?
> 
> Please tell me Im wrong! The $19,000 is assuming ALL 197 Reigstrars will
> pay. What happens when some of these Registrars dissappear? Will it also
> increase?
> 
> Please tell me Im wrong!
> 
> 
> Patricio Valdes
> Parava Networks
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Wesson" <wessorh@xxxxxx>
> To: "Jean-Michel Becar" <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
> Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 9:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Proposed budget is out for public comment
> 
> 
> > would those that have served on the budget committee provide specific
> > comments on just what they did?
> >
> > It appears that the registrars burden will have increased 150% and I'm
> > doubting that our reps did the registrars any good.
> >
> > would the reps on the budget committee please provide specific comments
> > on just how they "helped" us this time?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -rick
> >
> > Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> >
> > >Dear fellows registrars,
> > >
> > >The ICANN proposed budget for 2004 just get out for public comment.
> > >Enjoy the reading.
> > >Jean-Michel
> > >
> > >
> >
>