ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] RE: New STLD dates for public comment

  • To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: New STLD dates for public comment
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:27:48 -0500
  • Cc: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: Message from "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com> of "Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:57:15 EST." <DHEIJCFHPEMGGMBMIIDAMELMDKAA.michael@palage.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

If the substantive issue the ICANN BoD is nominally seeking public comment
on, before doing whatever random act dice and dementia drive them towards,
is the integer 14, then my comment will be that it is not prime.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>