<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Straw Poll
- To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Elana Broitman'" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Straw Poll
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:02:06 -0600
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200403091001.i29A1v87048365@nic-naa.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree with Eric. I know it looks like a done deal, but hopefully the DOC
will do more than rubberstamp it. I think we should follow through as a
matter of public record for any continuing efforts on Capital Hill or
otherwise.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
in Portland Maine
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:02 AM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Straw Poll
> One more note on this motion - now that the Board has voted on WLS, do the
> proponents still want a vote on this?
Of course. If we only voted with the Board what point would there be in the
notion of a registrar constituency? Please see By-Laws, kindly post section
empowering Chair to declare ballot question moot, etc. Thx.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|