ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars

  • To: svl@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars
  • From: elliot noss <enoss@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:43:36 -0400
  • Cc: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <3F8D2DD7.7847.9AE3DC@localhost>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Siegfried:

We have asked you numerous times, both publicly and privately for the specific German law you refer to. Please provide same or stop raising this issue. Thank you.

Regards

On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Siegfried Langenbach wrote:

Hallo,

I want to repeat something I already said in Rio:

according to german law (and I guess some other EU-law also) I
have a problem to ACK a outgoing transfer without explicit answer
of the registrant (the law is assuming consumer protection).

If ICANN accepts the regulation in which no answer from the
customer is treated as a YES, I will have to ask the german court for
a decision (in germany the loosing party pays all the court and
lawyer fees).

I have to do this as a self-protection act.
I still wonder why a better working process (auth_code) is not
used...

Respectfully
Siegfried Langenbach

Computer Service Langenbach GmbH (CSL GmbH)
GERMANY






On 15 Oct 2003 at 18:54, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

Subject: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars
Date sent:      	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:54:34 +1000
From:           	"Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:             	<registrars@xxxxxxxx>


Hello All,

Below is an updated version.  This version will be discussed by a
meeting of the ICANN staff Transfers Assistance Group later this week.

Note this form is for use by losing registrars after they receive
notification of a transfer from the registry. The losing registrar may
contact the registrant to confirm whether they have authorised a
transfer.  It is entirely optional for a losing registrar to send the
form.

The changes include:
- adding the ability to include multiple domain names
- some wording improvements suggested by Thomas Roessler (At Large
Advisory Committee)

Further comments welcome.

Regards,
Bruce


********************************************************************** **
******************

An English version of this message is contained below.

<Insert translation of English version in preferred language of the
registrant if known>

ENGLISH VERSION

DOMAIN NAME TRANSFER

Attention: <insert Registrant or Administrative Contact of Record as
listed in the WHOIS>

Re: Transfer of <insert domain name or list of domain names>

<insert name of registrar and/or name of reseller> received notification

on <insert date of notification> that you have requested
a transfer to another domain name registrar.

If you want to proceed with this transfer, you do not need to respond to
this message.

If you wish to cancel the transfer, please contact us before <insert
date> by:

[Note the following contact methods are optional and the order of
presentation is at the choice of the registrar]

[optional] send an email to <insert contact details>

[optional] send a fax to <insert contact details>

[optional] or please go to our website <insert URL of confirmation
webpage>
[Note: website to contain text as above, with the option to confirm or
deny the transfer.]

If we do not hear from you by <insert date>, the transfer will proceed.






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>