ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars

  • To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars
  • From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:21:59 +0200
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD7179222023569F0@phoenix.mit>
  • Reply-to: svl@xxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hallo,

I want to repeat something I already said in Rio:

according to german law (and I guess some other EU-law also) I 
have a problem to ACK a outgoing transfer without explicit answer 
of the registrant (the law is assuming consumer protection).

If ICANN accepts the regulation in which no answer from the 
customer is treated as a YES, I will have to ask the german court for 
a decision (in germany the loosing party pays all the court and 
lawyer fees).

I have to do this as a self-protection act.
I still wonder why a better working process (auth_code) is not 
used...

Respectfully
Siegfried Langenbach 
 
Computer Service Langenbach GmbH (CSL GmbH)
GERMANY
 





On 15 Oct 2003 at 18:54, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

Subject:        	[registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars
Date sent:      	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:54:34 +1000
From:           	"Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:             	<registrars@xxxxxxxx>

> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Below is an updated version.  This version will be discussed by a
> meeting of the ICANN staff Transfers Assistance Group later this week.
> 
> Note this form is for use by losing registrars after they receive
> notification of a transfer from the registry.  The losing registrar may
> contact the registrant to confirm whether they have authorised a
> transfer.  It is entirely optional for a losing registrar to send the
> form.
> 
> The changes include:
> - adding the ability to include multiple domain names
> - some wording improvements suggested by Thomas Roessler (At Large
> Advisory Committee)
> 
> Further comments welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************
> ******************
> 
> An English version of this message is contained below.
> 
> <Insert translation of English version in preferred language of the
> registrant if known>
> 
> ENGLISH VERSION
> 
> DOMAIN NAME TRANSFER 
> 
> Attention: <insert Registrant or Administrative Contact of Record as
> listed in the WHOIS>
> 
> Re: Transfer of <insert domain name or list of domain names>
> 
> <insert name of registrar and/or name of reseller> received notification
> 
> on <insert date of notification> that you have requested 
> a transfer to another domain name registrar. 
> 
> If you want to proceed with this transfer, you do not need to respond to
> this message.
> 
> If you wish to cancel the transfer, please contact us before <insert
> date> by:
> 
> [Note the following contact methods are optional and the order of
> presentation is at the choice of the registrar]
> 
> [optional] send an email to <insert contact details>
> 
> [optional] send a fax to <insert contact details>
> 
> [optional] or please go to our website <insert URL of confirmation
> webpage> 
> [Note: website to contain text as above, with the option to confirm or
> deny the transfer.]
> 
> If we do not hear from you by <insert date>, the transfer will proceed.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>