RE: [net-com] VeriSign and Neulevel

["Tina Dam" <dam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Phillip,
The task you are requesting can certainly be made - however, I have not seen
your email in time for this to be ready for today's call, reason being that
I this week is in Denmark. I will be on the call in about an hour and we can
discuss further.

Best regards,
Tina 

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 3:17 AM
To: 'Tina Dam'; 'Kurt Pritz'
Cc: net-com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [net-com] VeriSign and Neulevel


Tina,
It is regrettable that we receive lengthy comments from two potential
interested parties at the very end of the comment period. A little less
checking by the lawyers and more consideration for the process timelines
would have been helpful!

Could you do a comparison of the substantive changes proposed by Verisign
and Neulevel especially with respect to the absolute technical criteria?
They both propose lists and they might be essentially the same. A side by
side tabular comparison in a Word document would make evaluating these
possible additions much easier for the sub-committee on the June 22 call.
Look at the appendix of the Neulevel letter and the first part of the
Verisign letter.

Philip