Re: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry

[Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Perhaps the text on the NRO was a tragic failure?

mark

Greg Ruth wrote:
> Well, I kinda liked the text on NRO, but I'll go along with the
> majority.
>
> Greg
>
> --- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > All:
> >
> > Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of 
> > Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have 
> > attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
> > Here are the substantial changes in the document:
> >
> > - I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the 
> > administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4);
> > - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in
> > the 
> > discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4;
> > - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing
> > relationships 
> > with other related Internet organizations in some text in section
> > 2.7;
> > - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in
> >
> > section 2.2 and 2.4;
> >
> > I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for
> > a 
> > final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48
> > hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
> >
> > mark
> >
> > Mark McFadden
> > Secretariat
> > ISPCP Constituency
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com