<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
- To: mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
- From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vjKFPnPbd5BSAtWGegE2UC3EtpM5GogAfet8KaXV9CsmZK3OU8TaxIq9k8jHez1A4MZ+e5z9R+4tPnUNhDW4pHS9/9kWYvnAB23WIHYyYPBWKgiP+W/w/W4x7hirI7mFdldmcK39IWcMRpbhyx2CdU0tHA7yMmVgXn7YiLIkzT8= ;
- In-reply-to: <44BB98F8.4080206@21st-century-texts.com>
- Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, I kinda liked the text on NRO, but I'll go along with the
majority.
Greg
--- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All:
>
> Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of
> Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have
> attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
>
> Here are the substantial changes in the document:
>
> - I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the
> administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4);
> - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in
> the
> discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4;
> - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing
> relationships
> with other related Internet organizations in some text in section
> 2.7;
> - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in
>
> section 2.2 and 2.4;
>
> I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for
> a
> final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48
>
> hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
>
> mark
>
> Mark McFadden
> Secretariat
> ISPCP Constituency
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|