RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly mailing list

["Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ted.  Assuming no objections, I will reword as ICANN stakeholders
where appropriate.

Best

Debbie 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Prophet Partners Inc.
> Sent: 01 August 2007 15:57
> To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly 
> mailing list
> 
> Debbie, Danny and Joop,
> 
> From time to time, some 3rd party views are brought forth on 
> this mailing list. Perhaps, substituting ICANN stakeholders 
> for membership is better.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Ted
> Prophet Partners Inc.
> http://www.ProphetPartners.com
> http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Danny Younger'" 
> <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:51 AM
> Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General Assembly 
> mailing list
> 
> 
> > Good.  I think we are in agreement.  I will formulate the text to 
> > cover this, including: scope for ascertaining the views of the 
> > membership as a whole - as opposed to just the rough 
> consensus, voting 
> > procedures for elections etc., as well as voting at any 
> other time as 
> > determined by the membership - at the request of at least 5 
> voting members.  Agreed?
> >
> > I hope to have the next version available in the next 24 hours.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Debbie
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
> >> Sent: 26 July 2007 23:41
> >> To: Danny Younger
> >> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [ga] primary objectives of the General 
> Assembly mailing 
> >> list
> >>
> >> At 12:46 a.m. 27/07/2007, Danny Younger wrote:
> >>
> >> >As such, I would change the wording to read "to ascertain
> >> and transmit
> >> >the views of the membership".
> >>
> >> Agree.
> >> I am far more comfortable with that.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Please note that as some list participants are articulating
> >> the views
> >> >of special-interest communities (this is a cross-constituency 
> >> >platform), the output of this body cannot necessarily be
> >> viewed as the
> >> >"views of the ordinary citizen".
> >>
> >> Quite so.
> >> I would prefer to use  voting rules mainly for things 
> related to the 
> >> functioning of the list and elections of its officials.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -joop-
> 
> 
> 
>