<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] DNS Update Service
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] DNS Update Service
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LOsG/i/zYF1FpZsoOga69gxxUxWWPnSirZAHPCEABkyWgY1jy/96ZhXM25ZD//j0X46H4RCVuOf7Nli/hz4o+QvnSWYXf+eG9dbq0CPdNBB8oA03ytmHI0Cw4/alO+XKkUBVo1lP90Cf6+m3vhJFI+8a9S+/igMGmzhptq7+7pI= ;
- In-reply-to: <728332.69187.qm@web52201.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chuck,
A response on this would be most harmonious. While a wall would be most destructive.
Eric
Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chuck,
Regarding your proposed DNS Update Service -- see
http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/verisign-notice-22mar07.pdf
:
While I have no issue with the proposal, I am
concerned by the remark in your Background section
that states "to deter those who today abuse the data
provided in the twice daily zone update report".
Would you mind elaborating upon this comment? What
type of abuse has been observed? Which parties are
responsible for such abuse? Any clarification would
be appreciated.
Thanks,
Danny
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
---------------------------------
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|