ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA representation not a registrant constituency

  • To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] GA representation not a registrant constituency
  • From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:33:49 +1300
  • Cc: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <20070316224318.67920.qmail@web52908.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 11:43 a.m. 17/03/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
While certainly a stronger unified voice coming out of the GA should benefit small registrants and certainly that is large a portion of the participating members here. However this is not about creating a registrant constituency it is about giving this list a voice.

It should also be about giving the whole GNSO some more visibility, including its inadequate constituencies structure.


Additionally it can be about getting a better line to the Board and perhaps an observer or two at the Names Council and diverse task forces.

The worst that can happen is that things stay as they are.:-)


-joop-




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>