<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Notification of Self Organization
- To: roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] Notification of Self Organization
- From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=6MVicXAiIKDJAPaKhuDYKqe1P4/9/srzsxulhd9gjeiyJU+VUxsDipoDsudlUpUzhrUv0rsZV4qN2uo5eIQ/2BZkXgv3Yj94lIrHlLXCfP6+e5VnwHUSYkk8keniJHrSjqbZm4mUmOwGE01nv4At7eg2zqS7XfKQOwM6dlyovh4=;
- In-reply-to: <57027.165.224.215.1.1174076377.squirrel@webmail12.pair.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
--- roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The flow chart shows ICANN has no room for non-ISP
> registrant/businesses
> that are not interested in IP. The chart discloses the big hole in
> ICANN
> for registrant individuals and non-ISP/registrant/businesses that are
> not
> interested in IP. I think the GA self organization is a viable effort
> to
> plug that hole.
I'm not sure I follow. Going by what I posted earlier (fixed from the
first version, which had a small flaw; you replied to the 2nd fixed
version, though):
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06237.html
If you're a business that is not an ISP and not interested in
Intellectual Property, you would get to 5.b. i.e. you'd go -- 1. yes
---> 2. yes --> 3. no --> 4. no --> 5 no (and thus join the Business
Constituency).
Every yes/no sequence in that flowchart ends up somewhere -- if there's
a sequence that doesn't, please advice which sequence you think fails.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|