ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: Capture by a Self-interested Faction

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: Capture by a Self-interested Faction
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:02:21 +0100
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <464221.17434.qm@web52214.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Organization: NIC France
  • References: <464221.17434.qm@web52214.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:35:18PM -0800,
 Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 71 lines which said:

> These recommendations should be thrown into the trash,

Why? There were absolutely no reasons to reserve these
names. Therefore, there are no reasons to keep them frozen.

I am under the strong feeling that some people will refuse anything
coming from ICANN. Most of the time, ICANN is accused of regulating
too much. And now that a report suggest to loosen the grip,
always-complainers regret the old restriction?



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>