<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- To: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] RE: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:50 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=2nyp3AvInWAiYxCXBT1OvnEvLG3+kp1uE3ggDf4jQ+f6BsBWoEmVuXkR6ygYaM8cTI188adGSwEOMmqetQFueI/vIfE0M2EB21sUJo8G3qSUf88pWU4DBTSVLt5wHGd6lAkIUgWHLnIbevDK0DQpV0y/tuV7Bhnfis9GORUm8tU=;
- In-reply-to: <924BA87A-4D8F-4FE2-8118-5A1813C11EC1@navigator.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would like the simple question; Where does ICANN derive it's authority over ccTLDs specifically? Answered.
Eric
Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Elisabeth,
>
> If ICANN is providing a useful service with appropriate community
> input,
I'm sorry?
Did I miss sometthing?
---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|