ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Whois more in detail

  • To: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>, "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Whois more in detail
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:17:22 -0500
  • References: <CA68B5E734151B4299391DDA5D0AF9BF1078BE@mx1.dsoft.sk>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

thanks.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] Whois more in detail



Absolutely, Chris. In my opinion, reporting whois-noncompliant links is an essential part of the whois policy. This question will come forth anyway regardless of the whois model eventually chosen.

Dominik


-----Original Message-----
From: kidsearch [mailto:kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Dominik Filipp; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Whois more in detail


I see that as completely doable Dominik and appreciate the time you
spent on that. One question is would it be enforceable? I mean say I
registered a domain nameand said i was a nonprofit or noncomm, but then
built a commercial website anyway. There could be a link in the whois,
"report this website as noncompliant with whois rules" where users can
report that it is a commercial website and not a noncomm.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: [ga] Whois more in detail




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>